Module 2 Exercises:
Question 2.
A defendant was sentenced to probation, a $500 fine, and $250 in fees after pleading guilty to disorderly conduct. The court permitted a payment plan, with $100 due at sentencing and the balance within six months. The defendant borrowed $100 from their parents to pay the $100 at sentencing and missed car payments to pay two $100 installments. However, shortly after, they were laid off from their job, and failed to make the remaining payments within the six months.
As a result of unpaid balance, a petition to revoke the defendant’s probation was filed. The defendant appeared before the court for a hearing regarding the failure to pay the legal financial obligations and the probation revocation.
At the hearing, the court conducts an ability to pay assessment. From this interaction the court learns of the defendant’s change in employment, and that the amount originally assessed was a challenge for the defendant while employed. Because of this information, the court extends the payment plan and connects the court user to employment services.
Instructions: Answer each of the following true or false questions about what is likely to be true about the defendant after this second court hearing where the terms of the payment plan are changed.
[5] Martin, Karin D. et al. Annual Review of Criminology Monetary Sanctions: Legal Financial Obligations in US Systems of Justice. Annu. Rev. Criminol. (2018). https://www.annualreviews.org/docserver/fulltext/criminol/1/1/annurev-criminol-032317-091915.pdf?expires=1731431599&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=9E4CB442FE328FA61EB93B05734934EE.
See also, Harper, Annie et al. Debt, Incarceration, and Re-entry: a Scoping Review. American Journal of Criminal Justice : AJCJ vol. 46,2 (2021). https://perma.cc/6J6V-495R.