Juror Feedback Highlights the Need for Improved Education and Efficiency in Trials
The Trust in Justice Project, a collaborative effort by the Online Courtroom Project, the American Society of Trial Consultants, and the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA), released a new report on its exploration of public trust in the justice system. The Phase 2 Report is based on multiple focus group discussions with individuals from diverse demographics, political affiliations, and experiences with the justice system, including former jurors. The juror’s feedback highlights both positive and negative experiences. Many jurors appreciated the opportunity to serve, describing it as insightful and an important civic duty.
However, several raised concerns about inefficiencies in the system, particularly long waiting times and the financial burden of extended trials. Jurors expressed frustration with the lack of respect shown toward their time and commitment, especially in complex cases. Some also noted confusion over legal concepts and desired more comprehensive explanations of legal procedures to feel fully equipped for their roles.
Positive responses were more common from jurors involved in shorter, less complex trials. They reported higher levels of satisfaction and engagement, finding the process manageable and educational.
AI and Jury Selection in Indiana: Embracing Innovation
An article by trial consultant Rodney Nordstrom in the Indiana Bar Journal examines the potential of artificial intelligence (AI) to revolutionize jury selection. Nordstrom argues that by analyzing large volumes of data, including public records and social media, AI can help identify jurors with certain decision-making tendencies or biases, making the process more efficient and potentially reducing human errors or biases. He also cautions that its use raises concerns around privacy, ethics, and its inability to replicate the nuanced human judgment needed in interpreting body language and emotional responses during voir dire.
He concludes that AI should be used to support, rather than replace, human judgment by maintaining the critical role of attorneys and judges in assessing the full range of juror characteristics that technology may overlook.
A Juror's Experience: 14 Strangers, One Jury
In Ruidoso News, John Soden recounts his experience serving as a juror in Lincoln County, New Mexico. Initially reluctant, Soden found camaraderie among his fellow jurors during the long trial, despite the tedious proceedings and frequent breaks. He reflects on the sense of fairness in the judicial system and the importance of citizen participation in keeping courts fair and balanced
"But What Happens if We Lose?"
A Texas chapter of the American Board of Trial Advocates (TEX-ABOTA) is hosting an upcoming webinar entitled, "But What Happens if We Lose?” Plaintiff and Defense Perspectives on Managing Risk in Disputed Liability Catastrophic Injury Cases, on Tuesday October 1, at noon (Central Standard Time). The seminar is presented by the Rio Grande Valley Chapter of ABOTA.
Join panelists Guillermo "Memo" Tijerina, Jr., Jaime A. Saenz, Michael M. Guerra, and Ray Thomas to discuss their experiences working as attorneys in these complex matters. The program will be moderated by Frank Sabo.