Key Resources: Leadership
- Conference of State Court Administrators. (2012). 2012-2013 Policy Paper Evidence-Based Pretrial Release.
- Conference of Chief Justices. (2013). Endorsing the Conference of State Court Administrators Policy Paper on Evidence-Based Pretrial Release.
- McKinley, J. C., Jr. (2015). State’s Chief Judge, Citing ‘Injustice,’ Lays Out Plans to Alter Bail System.
- The Justice Management Institute. (2015). From Silo to System: What Makes a Criminal Justice System Operate Like a System?
- Conference of State Court Administrators. (2016). 2015-2016 Policy Paper The End of Debtors’ Prisons: Effective Court Policies for Successful Compliance with Legal Financial Obligations.
- Conference of Chief Justices and Conference of State Court Administrators. (2022). In Support of Efforts to Improve Appearance Rates in Criminal and Traffic Courts.
Key Resources: Management
- National Center for State Courts and Advancing Pretrial Policy and Research (2020). COVID-19 and Pretrial Practices: A Pretrial Executives Roundtable.
- National Center for State Courts and Advancing Pretrial Policy and Research (2020). COVID-19 and Pretrial Practices: A Judicial Roundtable.
- National Center for State Courts (2018). Evidence-Based Judicial Decision Making Curriculum Resources
- National Center for State Courts. (2018). Pretrial Justice Planning Guide for Courts.
- Crime and Justice Institute - Training and Assessment
- Joint Technology Committee. (2016). Using Technology to Improve Pretrial Release Decision-Making.
- Jones, M. R. (2013). Pretrial Performance Measurement: A Colorado Example of Going from the Ideal to Everyday Practice.
- National Institute of Corrections. (2011). Measuring What Matters: Outcome and Performance Measures for the Pretrial Services Field.
- National Institute of Corrections. (2008). Topics in Community Corrections: Applying Evidence-Based Practices in Pretrial Services.
- PJCC Pretrial Justice Brief. (2017). Data Supporting Pretrial Justice Reforms
All states, the District of Columbia, and most U.S. territories have statutory or constitutional provisions that enumerate rights and protections for victims of crime. Two key federal laws also address victims’ rights. The Crime Victims’ Rights Act (18 U.S.C ยง 3771), enacted in 2004, specifies a broad set of rights for victims of federal crimes and authorizes federal funding for programs to assist victims in asserting, accessing and enforcing those rights. The Victims of Crimes Act (42 U.S. Code Chapter 112), enacted in 1984, authorizes crime victim compensation and assistance to victims of federal and state crimes. These federal and state provisions generally articulate the following rights for victims throughout the criminal justice process: to be informed of proceedings and events; to attend proceedings and be heard; to proceedings free from unreasonable delay; to privacy and protection from intimidation and harassment; to restitution from the offender and to apply for crime victim compensation; and to enforcement of these rights and access to other available remedies. The Office for Victims of Crime supports an extensive searchable database (VictimLaw) of federal and state victims’ rights statutes, tribal laws, constitutional amendments, court rules, administrative code provisions, and case summaries of related court decisions.
According to a 2015 report by the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), nearly all states have laws that address more specifically the rights and interests of victims in pretrial release decision making and supervision. NCSL maintains a searchable database of these rights and protections. They relate to notice of proceedings and events (e.g., the pretrial release hearing and release of the defendant from jail); participation and input into proceedings (e.g., consultation about the possibility of the defendant’s release and potential release conditions); victim protection (e.g., required periods of detention for certain crimes before the defendant can be released, orders that restrict contact with the victim, and use of technology to alert the victim when the defendant is within a specified distance); victim compensation and restitution (e.g., two states authorize restitution without a finding of guilt); and privacy (e.g., prohibiting disclosure of victim identifying information in criminal justice records and contact information provided for notification). Although a broad range of rights and protections are afforded to victims, many victims are unaware of these rights or how to exercise them. Courts, justice system partners, and victim service providers should collaborate to educate victims about these critical avenues to meaningful participation in the criminal justice system.
- Californians for Safety and Justice/Community Resources for Justice (2013). California Crime Victims’ Voices: Findings from the First-Ever Survey of California Crime Victims and Survivors.
- Crime Victims’ Rights Act.
- National Center for Victims of Crime.
- National Center for State Courts (2015). Pretrial Justice Brief: Addressing Victims' Rights in Pretrial Justice Reform.
- National Conference of State Legislatures (2016). Pretrial Policy: What States are Doing to Protect Victims of Domestic Violence.
- National Conference of State Legislatures (2015). Trends in Pretrial Release: State Legislation and Victims’ Pretrial Release Rights and Protections Database.
- NCJA Center for Justice Planning (2015). The Role of Victims and Advocates in Pretrial Justice Reform. [Webinar]
- Office of Justice Programs, VictimLaw and About Victims’ Rights.
- Victim of Crimes Act.
- WomensLaw.org.
- National Center for State Courts (2018). Effective Court Responses to Persons with Mental Disorders
- Judges’ Criminal Justice/Mental Health Leadership Initiative (2016). Judge’s Guide to Mental Illnesses in the Courtroom.
- Justice Center, The Council of State Governments (2015). Improving Responses to People with Mental Illnesses at the Pretrial Stage: Essential Elements.
- National Association of Counties (2017). County Roles and Opportunities in Opioid Treatment for Justice-Involved Individuals.
- National Association of Counties (2017). County Roles and Opportunities in Reducing Mental Illness in Jails.
- National League of Cities (2017). City Strategies to Support Alternatives to Arrest for People with Substance Abuse Treatment Needs.
- National League of Cities (2017). How Cities Can Provide Alternatives to Jails and Improve Outcomes for Young Adults with Mental Health Concerns.
- Steadman, H. (2009). Prevalence of Serious Mental Illness Among Jail Inmates.
- Arifuku, I., & Wallen, J. (2013). Racial Disparities at Pretrial and Sentencing and the Effect of Pretrial Services Programs.
- Danner, M., VanNostrand, M., & Spruance, L. (2016). Race and Gender Neutral Pretrial Risk Assessment, Release Recommendations, and Supervision: VPRAI and Praxis Revised.
- Demuth, S. (2003). Racial and Ethnic Differences in Pretrial Release Decisions and Outcomes: A Comparison of Hispanic, Black, and White Felony Arrestees.
- Eaglin, J. & Solomon, D. (2015). Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disparities In Jails: Recommendations for Local Practice.
- Freiburger, T.L., et al. (2010). The Impact of Race on the Pretrial Decision.
- Jones, C. E. (2012). Confronting Racism in the Criminal Justice System: The ABA’s Racial Justice Improvement Project.
- Jones, C. E. (2013). “Give Us Free”: Addressing Racial Disparities in Bail Determinations.
- Levin, D. (2008). Pretrial Release of Latino Defendants.
- National League of Cities (2017). City Strategies to Reduce the Use of Jails for Young Adults.
- National Resource Center on Justice Involved Women (2016). Building Gender Informed Practices at the Pretrial Stage.
- Vera Institute for Justice (2018). Divided Justice: Uncovering trends in Black and White Jail Incarceration, 1990-2013.